Banting Diet

Banting diet really does work but there are questions, not so much about its effectiveness, but the safety of meal plans high in fats from animal sources.

This is a non critical description of the low carbohydrate combined with high saturated fat diet; on another page we'll comment on it.

It's been around for a while; in fact for over one hundred and fifty years. In 1862 William Banting was a morbidly obese undertaker in London. That means his body mass index was probably over 35. When he started going deaf, he decided to consult one of the most famous doctors of his day; Dr Harvey decided that fat was pressing on his ear drums and making him hard of hearing.

He put the suffering man on an unusual diet that will conflict utterly with everything you know and have read about weight loss; carbohydrate was strictly limited and he was allowed unlimited saturated fat. History has it that when WB again consulted Dr Harvey some six months later, the latter never even recognised Banting; he had lost an incredible amount of weight.

This meal plan has one enormous plus; fans claim that they aren't hungry on the high fat diet.

Professor Tim Noakes, sports guru at the University of Cape Town did a professional about turn in his teaching; realising the traditional high carbohydrate diet wasn't working for him or his athletes, he started to investigate the merits of the so called Banting diet proposed by no other than Dr William Harvey and so successfully followed by the other William; a high saturated fat meal plan instead of unlimited carbohydrate and very low fat.

Photograph of morbidly obese William Banting.

Banting Diet

Certainly Noakes has stirred the pot, and has many critics but equally thousands of fans who have lost significant amounts of weight; all without hunger.

Certainly one cannot quibble about the fact that America has become morbidly obese since biochemist Ancel Keys published in 1977 his thesis that cholesterol was the villain of the piece; saturated fat is the cause of heart disease. The dramatic turn in the ensuing years from the traditional American diet to a high starch and very low animal fat way of eating resulted in a nation of hungry people who couldn't stop snacking.

Tim Noakes has an impressive pedigree; he's no fly-by-night crank. After careful study of the research, he has come up with some very interesting facts.

  • It's carbohydrate and not saturated fat that raises blood cholesterol.
  • Strictly limiting all carbohydrate has a significant effect on lowering the blood glucose of diabetics.
  • High fat diets don't raise the risk of cardiovascular disease; rather the opposite. 
  • It's glycosated, or sugar rich, haemoglobin that really damages the inner lining of blood vessels, and not cholesterol. 

The Banting diet cuts right across everything you've been taught about losing weight. Unlimited animal fat is encouraged, polyunsaturate oils and margarine are banned, and you are encouraged to eat virtually no carbohydrate at all; less than 50g per day.

That means no bread or flour products and no sugar; no bagels or chocolate cake; unfortunately it also means no smart bran either; that means more cancer. Further, rice and potatoes, most fruit except berries, and pasta are all eliminated from the Banting diet.

So, butter is back, and you can enjoy the crackling on your pork chops. Steak is definitely on the menu, but not if it was corn fed. Starch makes all animals obese, including our cattle. More important it causes soaring blood glucose, especially in those who are insulin resistant, and that's what damages the tissues.

Proponents have pointed to huge weight losses, a drop in blood pressure and glucose readings; even lower total cholesterol.

Here's an important bit of research; the high carbohydrate coupled with very low fat diet has been strongly implicated in motor neuron disease; it may be a factor in MS too. This was done in studies done in Japan and confirmed by another in the Netherlands.

What does Banting mean?

The word is used both as a adjective, as in Banting diet, but also as a verb. It means to go on a diet that very strictly limits your carbohydrate but you can enjoy unlimited animal fat; olive oil and avocados, everyone agrees having 'healthy' fat, are recommended too. 

Many have been able to reduce their medication dramatically.

Professor Noakes, a highly qualified physician himself, takes several swipes at the pharmaceutical industry. Statins to lower cholesterol are very profitable drugs, with reportedly one quarter of Americans on them; organised medicine has resisted any challenge of Keys' unproven theory that saturated fat is the cause of the heart attack epidemic.

He also takes on the agricultural lobby that undergirds the 1977 dietary goals for Americans; he believes this is the real villain of the piece. Move bread, cereals, rice and pasta from the base of the food pyramid with 6 to 11 servings to the very top; use them very sparingly.

Steak, butter and bacon are all back in favour. Enjoy eating again, and you won't feel hungry; provided you stay strictly away from the starches. Remember, that means no bread, rice, chips or sugar.

Professor Noakes warns against the extreme danger of enjoying all the fat and steak parts of the Banting diet whilst continuing with the high carbohydrate diet; that's a recipe for disaster. In fact that's exactly the diet that had brought America to lower than fortieth place in the world health stakes. So, no bread with your burger.

There is also a strong move in the Banting diet away from polyunsaturate oils; sunflower, safflower and canola oils are out. Since margarines are made from hydrogenating these oils, it's also banished to Coventry.

There seems no doubt that hydrogenated and oxidised oils are one of the major causes of damage to the intima; the inner lining of the arteries. Next time you purchase a packet of french fries, first ask how long it is since the oil was changed. Those, and raised blood sugar, are the underlying causes of atherosclerosis. Add hypertension to the recipe and strokes and heart attacks are just around the corner.

From the joint pain and chiropractic standpoint too, a diet high in polyunsaturated fats is what raises the omega 6 to 3 ratio with its devastating inflammatory consequences.


Diabetes and banting is perhaps less controversial. Professor Noakes himself is diabetic and hence his particular interest. Immediately you start banting, you have to halve your insulin; that alone is impressive.

Noakes attributes his diabetes to two factors:

  1. A family history of diabetes.
  2. A (he now believes mistaken) commitment to the conventional medical advice for diabetics; eat a high carb diet.

Without a doubt this Banting diet profoundly helps the diabetic gain better blood sugar control; and that automatically means weight loss for the type 2.


Your chiropractor will be pleased too; he's less likely to crack a rib, an albeit rare complication of the treatment of rib subluxations. Diabetes osteoporosis is a serious concern with the explosion of new diabetics.

Better blood sugar control will contribute to the prevention of osteoporosis, but the banting diet changes many other things too; no legumes, no fruit except berries and limited low glycemic index starches like butternut.

More research needs to be done before anyone can claim that there is a positive relationship between osteoporosis and banting.

Butter is back

It's interesting that the Banting diet has recently come to prominence at the same moment in dietary history when researchers have come with the startling finding that there is absolutely no scientific basis for going off saturated fats and changing to polyunsaturates.

Butter is back is the slogan.

Helens 15 euro salad is in vogue; plenty of salads, high fat feta cheese, olives and olive oil; only the hummus is questioned. Legumes are not on Noake's list of allowed foods; I question that in my Banting diet rebuttal, and several other features of his version of the William Harvey diet.

The low GI bread too which features high on Helen's menu is disallowed. Not even the Queen is allowed bread and honey, even with butter if you're doing the traditional bant.

Let your food be your medicine was the advice of Hippocrates more than two millennia ago; it's still the best recommendation.

Banting diet modified

Owing to my concerns about banting as advocated by Tim Noakes, yet believing that he's onto something vital, we have come with our Banting diet modified menu plan. In short, include legumes and all low GI carbs, and emphasise rather the healthy fat in the olive and avocado and nuts and seeds.

In fact, I've discovered this is not new; there are five ketogenic diets, from the very low Banting diet at the one extreme, with low GI starch in the centre, to the modified Atkins diet at the most generous. All encourage high fat.


Beets would not qualify for the Banting diet because of its carbohydrate. Indeed it has a moderately high glycemic index of 65; however the amount of carbohydrate in beetroot - the glycemic load - is very low, so that you would have to consume a dozen beets to affect your blood sugar. Overall then, beets are acceptable in my opinion, especially because of their important role in adult potty training; we live in a seriously constipated society, and the benefits of the fibre in beets greatly outweigh their carbohydrate content.

That fibre is also a starch, but it is resistant, reaching the colon for digestion to healthy short chain fatty acids, instead of glucose.

Animal protein

Strictly limiting carbohydrates has meant more fat and protein; since legumes are taboo if you are following the authentic Banting diet, that means a lot more animal protein; that is not a smart move. The World Health Organisation says high animal protein diets are almost certainly associated with cancer.

One good way to cook roasts is using solar pressure cooking. It cuts the cooking time by two thirds.

The environmentalists, looking at the devastating effect of greenhouse gases, have fingered animal husbandry as one of the major causes of increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. To save the planet we should move entirely away from animal protein.

So, much debate, and many contradictions.

Free weight loss programs

Free weight loss programs that focus on glycemic index rather than high this, or low that are a far more sensible way to shed those extra pounds.

Plus, it's importance to focus on the proven fact that overall only 5% of people who diet are any less heavy a year later; and many have put on weight.

It's far more sensible to my mind to follow a sensible and sustainable eating pattern than any diet, including banting.

My biggest beef with the banting diet is the banning of legumes; that means far too much protein of animal origin.

Banting for epilepsy

Epilepsy is a very trying disease, especially in children. Many do not respond at all to medication. Over 50% of children respond extremely well to banting for a period of at least three months, and in some cases, up to five years. But the diet has to be extremely carefully managed by experienced dieticians, and the amount of carb allowed is extremely small.

The aim is to turn the brain to using ketones instead of glucose for energy.

Useful links

Did you find this page useful? Then perhaps forward it to a suffering friend. Better still, Tweet or Face Book it.

Interesting challenges of the day

1. Mr S is a 76 year old man with neck pain of some 9 months duration. Luckily, most of the discomfort is upper cervical which is only rarely arthritic; his lower cervical spine is a degenerative mess that I have left alone. After seven treatments his pain and stiffness is 50 percent better, and he is happy in the circumstances. He can sleep through the night now and that makes a huge difference.

2. Mr P is 32 year old man with very severe lower back pain radiating to the big toe which is 30 percent numb. He had an episode three weeks ago, took anti-inflammatories and was soon better as is typical of the medial disc herniation. But before it healed, after a trivia it came roaring back, much worse. The characteristic crossed sign was evident; sitting in a chair, straightening the right leg provoked severe left back pain and tingling in the leg. He is doing well.

3. Severe lower back pain is scary; just ask Mrs P. Just watching her get out of the car I she was in trouble; she had a slipped disc at L4 making her lean towards the opposite side; luckily she had no pain in the leg. Despite family pressure that this was far too severe for a chiropractor, she persevered. Within five days she was standing upright, and after two weeks almost pain-free. 

Despite a hectic job, she wisely took my advice and stayed home for what I call exercising bed rest.

4. Mr S has had lower back, groin and back of thigh and calf pain for fourth months.

He has a pincer deformity in the hip causing the stabs in the groin, and a degenerative facet causing the sciatica. Both are responding well to chiropractic and he is well pleased; sixty-five percent better after three treatments.

5. Mr T is a wise man; he has taken a warning TIA seriously and has lost 15 pounds, and has at least as much again to lose. A change to a low starch diet and half hour daily stroll has made the difference; but the walking is making his foot and back miserable. The expensive orthotic is hopeless; luckily his hips and back are fine, but he needs a simple heel lift; he has a short leg.

6. I too have had serious lower back issues, luckily fixed by my own chiropractor; so I too have to do my exercises, take care when lifting supers full of honey, gardening and using the chainsaw. Regaining the function of your spine is just as important as the pain.

7. My own granddaughter, only 7 is hypermobile giving her pelvic, knee and ankle issues. X-rays show a mildly dysplastic hip. Years ago we would have called it growing pains. She too regularly needs chiropractic care and luckily responds well. Increased range of motion is more difficult than too stiff in my opinion. Our care is for kids too.

8. This 65-year old lady is a serious gardener; every day she is bending, lifting and digging for 2 to 3 hours a day. It regularly catches her in the sacroiliac joint, so she has a treatment once a month that sorts it out. She does her lower back exercises faithfully.

9. This 88-year old lady is an inspiration; every day she is busy in the community. With a nasty scoliosis she manages very well with a chiropractic adjustment every six weeks and exercises faithfully done. 

10. Mr X is a 71-year old retired man who wants to continue with maintenance care every six to eight weeks; he had suffered from two years of lower back pain when he first came a few months ago. He has no discomfort now after 8 chiropractic treatments, but is aware that danger lurks.

11. Mrs C has been having severe headaches, and taking a lot of analgesics. It is a non-complicated upper cervical facet syndrome, and she is doing well.

12. Mr D is a 38-year old year man with chronic shoulder pain after a rotator cuff tear playing cricket. It responded well to treatment, but he knows he must do his exercises every day; for two years he could not sleep on that shoulder.

13. Mr D, a 71-year old man, has a severe ache in the shoulder and midback since working above his head. Trapped nerve tests are negative but he has advanced degenerative joints of Luschka; after just two treatments he is 50 percent better. Can we reach 90?

And so the day goes; chiropractors should not be treating the elderly most medical sites state but that is so much bunkum.

Do you have a problem that is not getting better?

Are you looking for a different slant on your pain?

Do you want to pose a question?

Interesting questions from visitors

CLS writes:

Greetings, Dr B.

You helped me quite some time back with a soothing and professional response which turned out to be exactly correct. I now consult a local chiropractor. You write a superb newsletter, too.

Your own unresolved problem. Pose a question

Knowing that up to 70 percent of the time the correct diagnosis is made with no examination, no special tests, no xrays, but just from the history, there is a fair chance I can add some insight to your unresolved problem. But at least 30% of the time, I may be quite wrong. Give plenty of detail if you want a sensible reply.

You visited this chiropractic help site no doubt because you have a problem that is not resolving and want to know more about what a DC does.

The quickest and most interesting way is to read one of my eBooks of anecdotes. Described by a reader as gems, both funny and healthful from the life and work of a chiropractor, you will love them. Priced right at $2.99, though Kindle fiddles the amount without telling me.