Immobilization Arthritis

Cartilage degeneration sets in when joints are deprived of movement, for whatever reason.

My first conscious experience of it was some twenty-five years ago when I was consulted my a young man with low back pain caused by a very odd gait; he was unable to bend his right knee.

Five years previously he was shot in the upper thigh with a high calibre rifle. The femur shattered but the knee itself was not injured. His whole leg, foot to hip, was immobilised in a plaster cast for over a year. At the end of the period, the fracture healed but he was unable to bend his knee even slightly, and never regained the movement. Starved of nutrition from the normal effect of synovial fluids swilling about in the joint, the cartilage rapidly, and irreversibly, degenerated.

That in effect is what happens in the spine when much smaller facet and disc joints become fixated. The hyaline cartilage that lines the ends of bones is utterly dependent on the synovial fluid within the capsule for its requirements. Should the nutrients and oxygen not be replenished, and waste products removed, immobilisation arthritis sets in.

A degenerative facet joint as seen on CT scan.

Degenerative joint arthritis.

Cervical Spine degeneration

Mrs S, 42 years old, consulted me three weeks ago complaining of severe arm pain and tingling in the thumb and forefingers of both hands. Worse was a burning sensation on the soles of both feet and, in the mandibular distribution the left Cranial Nerve V, numbness and tingling.

The condition started insidiously in 2004. There was no known cause, and no trauma is recalled. There was (and is) no pain in the neck. She did complain of stiffness in the neck, however.

Early facet joint arthritis in cervical spine.

A tentative diagnosis of MS was made in 2006 by a neurologist. Parkinson's medication eased the pain sufficiently for her to sleep at night, but had abhorrent side effects. Nothing else helped.

Immobilisation Arthritis

Advanced cervical spine arthritis.

For the purposes of this page on immobilisation arthritis, orthopaedic and neurological details will be omitted.

Notice the relatively minor degenerative changes in the first and third x-rays taken in 2006. The radiological report stated that there was slight loss of C5 on C6 disc space; the spinal canal had sufficient depth, and the foramina were all normal.

Notice the severe changes that have occurred in only three and a half years. I have only shown the right oblique, but the left is almost identical.

Early foraminal encroachment arthritis.
Advanced foraminal encroachment arthritis.

Notice the advanced degenerative changes in the unco-verebtral joints bilaterally. The astonishingly swift development of Immobilisation Arthritis gives testimony to the importance of normal joint nutrition and movement.

The ins and outs of this case have not yet been satisfactorily settled. The MRI does not give clear cut signs of cord impression causing long tract signs in her feet. The absence of obvious temporomandibular joint symptoms leaves the numbness in the face unexplained. Hyperparathyroidism should be considered. She does also have an upper cervical fixation, perhaps effecting the sensory nucleus of cranial nerve V in the upper neck.

The association of TMJ and upper cervical subluxations is of course legendary.

Severe uncinate degeneration arthritis.


CT of the ankle joint showing cuboid arthritis.

Here we can see exactly the same pathological process occurring in the calcaneo-cuboid joint.


1. Chiropractic Subluxation

A subluxation from the Chiropractic viewpoint, is a HYPO-mobile joint with DECREASED movement, but no instability due to ligamentous damage.

It is this loss of movement that causes Immobilisation Arthritis.

2. Medical Subluxation

A subluxation on the other hand, from a Medical viewpoint, is a HYPER-mobile joint as would occur in trauma, or interestingly in conditions such as Rheumatoid Arthritis. Ligamentous laxity allows for INCREASED movement.

Is it any wonder that confusion reigns? In the Chiropractic model, mobilisation and manipulation (or an adjustment, as I still call it) is the treatment of choice. In the Medical model, it's strictly contraindicated.


(aka Proprio-receptors)

Mechanoreceptors in ligaments, muscles and the capsules record movement in the joint, amongst other things, giving the CNS vital information about position sense, and contributing to posture and balance.

Interestingly, in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord they have an INHIBITORY effect on information relayed from Nociceptors.


Nociceptors do not carry pain sensation, but they inform the CNS about noxious stimuli and other potentially harmful information from the body.

In particular, chemosensitive nociceptors carry information about noxious stimuli to a nerve root, for example, that is being bathed in the toxic byproducts of joint cartilage nutritiion. Normally such wastes would be dispersed, but in hypo-mobile joints, such wastes accumulate causing a noxious effect on the capsule, hyaline cartilage and adjacent nerves.

Cell degeneration has been demonstrated within thirteen hours (in white mice) of artificial joint fixation. These degredation products set up an inflammatory cycle further adding to the dorsal horn bombardment by nociceptors.

Double Wammy

Hypomobile joints cause INCREASED noxious stimuli entering the dorsal horn, and DECREASED inhibition of this nociceptor activity by mechanoreceptors in the dorsal horn.

Initially, this is a silent process. There is no pain, that comes later.

Worse, this increased nociceptor activity has been shown to have a cascading effect on the autonomic system, and general health.


On X-ray, Osteo Arthritis and Immobilisation Arthritis are indistinguishable. But histologically they are quite different. There are many hundreds of peer-reviewed journal articles dating back to the 1960's confirming and defining Immobilisation Arthritis.


Proteoglycans are chemicals found in the spaces between collagen fibres. They have special water-binding properties giving collagen its elastic properties. They also link individual collagen fibres to one another.

Okazaki and his fellow researchers confirming the existence of Immobilisation Arthritis found that:

  1. There is demonstratable proteoglycan loss within one week of the onset of joint hypomobility.
  2. Hyaline cartilage changes can be measured within one day of joint fixation.

Notice here that, once they hyaline cartilage covering of the bone has been breached - in this case by the butcher's saw; fluids in the joint have immediate access to the underlying bone. That is what sets up inflammation, and the cysts that form within arthritic bone.

Articular cartilage of immobilized knee joints of rabbits were shown by Okazaki et al was found to have severe degeneration 42 days after mobilization.

Hyaline cartilage

Degenerative lumbar disc disease

The nucleus pulposis has a very high metabolic rate, but no blood supply. It lives only 'because of movement' (Mooney, Spine 1987), movement being the nutritional pump that drives nutrients, oxygen and waste products in and out of the disc. Without movement the water-binding property of the proteogycans in the nucleus is lost as the cells, starved of nutrients, begin to degenerate as Immobilisation Arthritis sets in.

Worse, waste products and intracellular fluids released as the cells degenerate are trapped within the fixated disc, setting up an inflammatory reaction, and a "chemical radiculitis".

It is the water bound by the proteoglycans in the nucleus that pressurises the disc, keeping the vertebral bodies apart. When it is lost, the disc (as seen in MRI) is lost and it loses its bright white colour. Eventually it is bone on bone.

Notice the normal white disc at L3-L4, and the dark degenerating disc at L4-L5, with the inevitable posterior bulge, also arrowed.

Degenerative arthritis of a lumbar disc joint.


What makes things difficult for chiropractors, and I presume surgeons, is that very often there is more that one disc complaining. In this case, we can see that the lowermost disc at L5-S1 is also bulging. Diagnosing which disc is currently causing symptoms is part of the art of chiropractic.

Modic effect

Patients with degenerating discs sometimes get swelling within the vertebral body itself, seen on MRI. On T2 image an increased intensity of the signal is seen.

Researchers have shown that as the disc degenerates there are increasing forces on the vertebral endplates, resulting in microfractures and fissures into the subchondral bone.

Fluid leaking into the bone causes the hyperintense signal seen above.

Clinically these patients have a deeper, more constant pain, often at night and an ache that may not respond well to a heavy exercise programme.

It is often assumed that degenerative change is untreatable; the damage is done. Nothing could be further from the truth; chiropractic for arthritis[2] is what we specialise in every single day.

Facet hyaline cartilage

The facet joints too only live "because of movement," to use Mooney's pregnant phrase. The cartilage likewise degenerates should it be starved of nutrients and poisoned by toxic wastes caused by spinal fixations; immobilisation arthritis.

However another effect occurs: Loss of disc height places an increased load on the facet joints.

Furthermore altered biomechanics places further strain on the facet joints and ligaments. The net result is cartilage degeneration and cartilage degeneration.

Obesity and smoking

Obesity, disability and arthritis are strongly related.

Arthritis, smoking and obesity are all first cousins. Kissing cousins, that close. The reasons are complex, firstly because of chemical changes in the body as the large fat deposits start to act as glands producing noxious chemicals, but also simply because the increased weight on the joints. Smoking starves joints of their required oxygen. Result: degeneration joint disease.

See someone using a walker. Nine out of ten are obese because of the arthritis in hips, knees or feet.

Smoking, emphysema and degenerative arthritis.


As every chiropractor knows, patients who manipulate their own spines apparently get temporary relief but the symptoms and signs soon worsen, often with the onset of a radiculopathy.

Is this a contradiction? If mobilisation and adjustment of fixated joints reduces the toxic effect of joint hypomobility on articular cartilage, why should self-manipulation have the opposite effect?

My theory is that self-manipulation:

  • is done without distraction of the joints.
  • the joints either above or below the fixated joints are the ones predominantly mobilised and 'cracked'.
  • Self manipulators get very slight temporary relief, but need to crack the joint again within a few hours, often cracking the joint ten or more times in a single day.
  • In contrast, chiropractic adjustments wouldn't be done more than perhaps 25 times in a single year to any one joint (and that may be too much).
  • "Over-manipulation" may reduce Immobilisation Arthritis, but increase Traumatic Cartilage Degenerative Changes.

That is my theory anyway. Our critics, and some patients, accuse us of discouraging self-manipulation so we chiropractors can make more money.

However, in my experience, self-manipulators inevitably end up with dreadful joint pathology. Furthermore, if they continue to crack their own joints, our care no longer seems to help them.

When browsing these links use right click and "Open Link in New Tab", or you may get a bad gateway signal.

Did you find this page useful? Then perhaps forward it to a suffering friend. Better still, Tweet or Face Book it.

Share this page:
Enjoy this page? Then forward it to a friend. Here's how...

Would you prefer to share this page with others by linking to it?

  1. Click on the HTML link code below.
  2. Copy and paste it, adding a note of your own, into your blog, a Web page, forums, a blog comment, your Facebook account, or anywhere that someone would find this page valuable.